Volume 4, Issue 2 (2019)
IJMPP 2019, 4(2): 192-201 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khorasani J, Tavafian S S, Zarei F. Effect of Educational Intervention Based on the Ergonomic Principles of Working with Computers in Promoting Behaviors Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders among Health Care Providers. IJMPP 2019; 4 (2) :192-201
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-596-en.html
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-596-en.html
1- MSc student, Health Education & Health Promotion, Department of Health Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
2- Professor, Department of Health Education & Health Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
3- Assistant professor, Department of Health Education, & Health Promotion Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
2- Professor, Department of Health Education & Health Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
3- Assistant professor, Department of Health Education, & Health Promotion Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.
Abstract: (7022 Views)
Aims: Health care providers working in comprehensive health centers are considered as one of the main computer users and are subject to musculoskeletal disorders caused by computer work. This study was conducted to determining the effect of educational intervention based on the ergonomic principles of working with computers on knowledge, attitude and practice of health care providers working in comprehensive health centers of Sirjan , Iran.
Instrument & Methods: This study was performed with 110 health care providers working in comprehensive health centers of Sirjan. Census method was used for sampling. A man-made questionnaire was used to assess the effect of education on the improvement of behaviors preventing the MSD caused by working with computers. The training program in the intervention group consisted of three one-hour sessions. Data were collected at the beginning and 3 months after the intervention; and they were analyzed using spss16 software and Chi-square, independent T-test, and Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests.
Findings: According to the results, despite the homogeneity of the two groups in terms of all the variables studied, the interventional group, after education, had a significant difference in knowledge, attitude and practice regarding observing the ergonomic principles of work with computers in comparison with the control group (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, in the intervention group three months after the training, there was a significant difference in the mean score of two variables of attitude and practice.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that educational programs based on ergonomic principles of working with computers can promote behaviors preventing the MSD in computer users. Therefore, educational interventions are recommended in order to improve the behaviors preventing musculoskeletal disorders.
Instrument & Methods: This study was performed with 110 health care providers working in comprehensive health centers of Sirjan. Census method was used for sampling. A man-made questionnaire was used to assess the effect of education on the improvement of behaviors preventing the MSD caused by working with computers. The training program in the intervention group consisted of three one-hour sessions. Data were collected at the beginning and 3 months after the intervention; and they were analyzed using spss16 software and Chi-square, independent T-test, and Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests.
Findings: According to the results, despite the homogeneity of the two groups in terms of all the variables studied, the interventional group, after education, had a significant difference in knowledge, attitude and practice regarding observing the ergonomic principles of work with computers in comparison with the control group (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, in the intervention group three months after the training, there was a significant difference in the mean score of two variables of attitude and practice.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that educational programs based on ergonomic principles of working with computers can promote behaviors preventing the MSD in computer users. Therefore, educational interventions are recommended in order to improve the behaviors preventing musculoskeletal disorders.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal Disorders, Ergonomic Principles, Computer Users, Educational Interventions.
Subject:
Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention
Received: 2019/07/20 | Accepted: 2019/08/1 | Published: 2019/09/22
Received: 2019/07/20 | Accepted: 2019/08/1 | Published: 2019/09/22
References
1. World Health Organization. Health promotion for working populations: report of a WHO expert committee [meeting held in Geneva from 9 to 15 June 1987].
2. Cheng, H., Cheng, C, Ju Y. Work-related MSD and ergonomic risk factors in early intervention educators. Appl Ergon, 2013. 44(1): 134-141 [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.06.004]
3. Shariat, A., et al., Effects of stretching exercise training and ergonomic modifications on musculoskeletal discomforts of office workers: a randomized controlled trial. Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 2018. 22(2): 144-153. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.003]
4. Gerr, F., Marcus M., Monteilh C. Epidemiology of MSD among computer users: lesson learned from the role of posture and keyboard use. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2004. 14(1): 25-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.014]
5. Kraatz, S., Lang, J., Kraus, T., Muenster, E.,Ochsmann, E. The incremental effect of psychosocial workplace factors on the development of neck and shoulder disorders: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2013. 86(4): 375-395. [DOI:10.1007/s00420-013-0848-y]
6. Choobineh, A., Methods of posture assessment in occupational ergonomics. Hamadan: Fanavaran, 2003:79-96.
7. Harisinghani, M. G., Blake, M. A., Saksena, M., Hahn, P. F. Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites. Radiographics, 2004. 24(2): 615-627. [DOI:10.1148/rg.242035089]
8. Hoogendoorn, W. E., van Poppel, M. N., Bongers, P. M., Koes, B. W. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work andprivate life as risk factors for back pain. Spine, 2000. 25(16): 2114-2125 [DOI:10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017]
9. Gorgi, Z., Assadollahi, Z., Ghaffarian, A., Rezaeian, M. The Prevalence of MSD in the Employees of Office Systems at Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences in 2012. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 2014. 12(12): 991-1002.
10. Mouodi, M., Hasanzadeh H., CTD from ergonomics and occupational medicine viewpoint. 20041)10:9-
11. Sheikhzadeh, A., Gore, C., Zuckerman, J. D. Nordin, M.Perioperating nurses and technicians' perceptions of ergonomic risk factors in the surgical environment. Applied ergonomics, 2009. 40(5): 833-839. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.09.012]
12. Choobineh, A., Hosseini, M., Lahmi, M. Musculoskeletal problems in Iranian hand-woven carpet industry: Guidelines for workstation design. Appl Ergon, 2007. 38(5): 617-624. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.005]
13. Rafieipoor A, Rafieipoor E, Sadeghian M., Effectiveness of ergonomic principles to reduce the risk of MSDs by Rula in Computer users. Ergonomics magazine Quarterly Journal of Iranian Ergonomics and Human Factors Engineering, 2015. 3, (1), 25-32.
14. Fleiss, J.L., Levin, B., Paik M.C. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2013: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Cork, R.C., et al., A comparison of the verbal rating scale and the visual analog scale for pain assessment. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology, 2004. 8(1): 23-38. [DOI:10.5580/1a73]
16. Ohlsson, K., Attewell, R. G., Johnsson, B., Ahlam, A., S. An assessment of neck and upper extremity disorders by questionnaire and clinical examination. Ergonomics, 1994. 37(5): 891-897. [DOI:10.1080/00140139408963698]
17. Palmer, K., Smith, G., Kellingray, S.,Cooper, C. Repeatability and validity of an upper limb and neck discomfort questionnaire: the utility of the standardized Nordic questionnaire. Occupational medicine, 1999. 49(3): 171-175. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/49.3.171]
18. Menshadi, F., Azari, A., Kuhpayeh Zadeh, J., Ghasemi.,M. Knowledge, attitude and practice of osteoporosis among a group of iranian adolescent females. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation, 2009. 2(3): 47-54.
19. Anderson, K.D., K.E. Chad, Spink,K.S. Osteoporosis knowledge, beliefs, and practices among adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2005. 36(4): 305-312. [DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.03.007]
20. Mohammadi, Z.I. Mohammadi Z.B. The effect of stage-matched educational intervention on reduction in MSD among computer users. 2012.
21. Mohammadi Zeydi, E.,Heydarnia., A. Niknami S. Predicting factors of worker behavior for proper working posture based on planed behavior theory. Armaghane danesh, 2008. 13(3): 111-122.[Persian]
22. Tavafian, S. S., Jamshidi, A., Mohammad, K., Montazeri, A. Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2007. 8(1): 21. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-8-21]
23. Choobineh, A. R., Daneshmandi, H. A., Aghabeigi, M., Haghayegh, A. Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among employees of Iranian petrochemical industries: October 2009 to December 2012. Int J Occup Environ Med (The IJOEM), 2013. 4(4):195- 204.
24. Delshad, M. H., Tavafian, S. S., Kazemnejad, A., identification of the factors predicting the Stretching Exercise Behavior among Office employees with reinforcing and developing the performance of the Health Promotion Model .NeuroQuantology 2019; 17(08):49-56. [DOI:10.14704/nq.2019.17.8.2575]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |