Volume 1, Issue 3 (2016)                   IJMPP 2016, 1(3): 93-100 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 20.1001.1.24765279.2016.1.3.1.2

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tavafian S S, Jamshidi A R, Mohammad K. Treatment of Low Back Pain: Extended follow up of an Original Trial comparing a Multidisciplinary Group-based Rehabilitation Program with Oral Drug Treatment alone up to 36 months. IJMPP 2016; 1 (3) :93-100
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-9272-en.html
Treatment of Low Back Pain: Extended follow up of an Original Trial comparing a Multidisciplinary Group-based Rehabilitation Program with Oral Drug Treatment alone up to 36 months
Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian1 , Ahmad Reza Jamshidi * 2, Kazem Mohammad3
1- Department of Health Education Faculty of Medical Sciences Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Rheumatology Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (5644 Views)
Background: This study is an extended follow up of the original trial study (NCT00600197) that has been published in the clinical journal of pain. This trial aimed to explore if the proposed multidisciplinary program could improve quality of life and disability of the patients suffering from chronic low back up to 36 months. Methods and Material: In this Clinical Randomized trial seventy percent (139 of 197) of the participants who had taken part in the original study including 66 patients in intervention group and 73 patients in control group were followed up to 36 months after intervention. The intervention group continued receiving monthly motivational consultation and booster classes plus oral medication but the other group received just medication. Data on measures of Short Form 36 (SF-36) Quebec Disability Scale (QDS) and Ronald Morris Disability (RDQ) were collected at 3-6-12-18-24-30- and 36-month follow ups and analyzed through RMANOVA. Results: The 2 groups were comparable regarding all baseline characteristics (P > 0.05) except for education level that was better in intervention group (P = 0.01). Two groups were improved regarding all studied variables over time up to 36 month (P < 0.001) Moreover the intervention group in comparison with the control group had consistently better outcomes regarding all variables. There were no significant differences within each group by time in terms of all variables (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The proposed multidisciplinary program could reduce low back pain and improve quality of life and disability up to 36 months in chronic low back pain patients.
Keywords: Chronic Low Back Pain Multidisciplinary Group-based Rehabilitation Clinical trial study
Full-Text [PDF 287 kb]   (2885 Downloads)    
Subject: Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention
Received: 2016/05/5 | Accepted: 2016/09/8 | Published: 2016/09/15
References
1. Eklund A. Axén I. Kongsted A. M. Lohela-Karlsson M. LeboeufYde C. & Jensen I. (2014) Prevention of low back pain: effect cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of maintenance care-study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials.15-102. [DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-102]
2. GuzmánJ. Esmail R. KarjalainenK. MalmivaaraA. Irvin E. & Bombardier C. (2001) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. British Medical Journal. 322 1511-1516. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1511]
3. Keedy N. H. Keffala V. J.Altmaier EM. & Chen J. J. (2014) Health locus of control and self-efficacy predict back pain rehabilitation outcomes. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal. 34 158.
4. Malaty A. Sabharwal J. Lirette S. Chaiban G. Eissa H. & Tolba R. (2014) How to assess a new patient for a multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program: a review article. The Ochsner Journal. 14: 96-100.
5. Petit A. Roche-Leboucher G. Bontoux L. Dubus V. Ronzi Y. Roquelaure Y. et al. (2014) Effectiveness of three treatment strategies on occupational limitations and quality of life for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Is a multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC [DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-15-131]
6. Tavafian S. S. Jamshidi A. R. & Mohammad K. (2011) Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain. A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Multidisciplinary Group-based Rehabilitation Program and Oral Drug Treatment with Oral Drug Treatment Alone. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 27 (9) 811-818. [DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31821e7930]
7. Tavafian S. S. Gregory D. & Montazeri A. (2008) The experience of low back pain in Iranian women: a focus group study. Health Care For Women International. 29 (4) 339-348. [DOI:10.1080/07399330701876356]
8. Vollenbroek-Hutten MM. Hermens HJ. Wever D. Gorter M. Rinket J. & IJzerman MJ . (2004) Differences in outcome of a multidisciplinary treatment between subgroups of chronic low back pain patients defined using two multiaxial assessment instruments: the multidimensional pain inventory and lumbar dynamometry. Clinical Rehabilitation. 18 (5) 566-579. [DOI:10.1191/0269215504cr772oa]
9. Vong SK. Cheing GL. Chan F. So EM. & Chan CC. (2011) Motivational Enhancement Therapy in Addition to Physical Therapy Improves Motivational Factors and Treatment Outcomes in People With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 92 (2) 176-183. [DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.016]
10. Zappaterra M. Jim L. & Pangarkar S. (2014) Chronic pain resolution after a lucid dream: A case for neural plasticity? Medical Hypotheses. 82 (3) 286-290. [DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2013.12.011]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.