Volume 3, Issue 2 (2018)                   IQBQ 2018, 3(2): 1-5 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Norouzi S, Tavafian S, Kahrizi S. Design and Evaluation of Measurement Tool for Sitting Situation Using Validity and Reliability. IQBQ. 2018; 3 (2) :1-5
URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-32-21926-en.html
1- Health Education Department, Medical Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Health Education & Health Promotion Department, Medical Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , tavafian@modares.ac.ir
3- Physical Therapy Department, Medical Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (73 Views)
Aims: The sitting posture and its related problems are of high importance. The current research was conducted with the aim of design and evaluation of a measurement tool for sitting situation, using validity and reliability.
Instruments and Methods: In this semi-experimental (field trial) study, a number of questions about knowledge, attitude, and behavior were designed and content validity and face validity were utilized to assess the validity. Then, questionnaire was given to 10 specialists in health education, physiotherapists, and ergonomists. Moreover, Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) were calculated to determine content validity, and for reliability assessment, two criteria were used, including internal consistency through Cronbach's alpha and test-retest through Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficient. Consequently, 30 students were enrolled in the study. The data were analyzed by SPSS 22 software.
Findings: Firstly, of all 29 questions in terms of knowledge, attitude, and behavior, 23 items remained with CVR higher than 0.6 and CVI tables were higher than 0.7. From 23 items referring to the 3 mentioned spectra, 12 questions were in the field of knowledge, 6 questions were in the field of attitude, and 5 questions were in the field of behavior. Then, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.87, the ICC was 0.983, and Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.966 (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The designed questionnaire can appropriately examine sitting situation in terms of the knowledge, attitude, and behavior; therefore, it is an excellent tool for measuring these characteristics owing to satisfactory validity and reliability.
Full-Text [PDF 315 kb]   (19 Downloads)    

Received: 2018/04/10 | Accepted: 2018/05/30 | Published: 2018/06/21

References
1. Hong Y, Cheung CK. Electromyographic responses of back muscles during load carriage walking in children. ISBS Conf Proc Arch. 2002;405-8. [Link]
2. Rezaei J, Babakhani F. The effects of unilateral backpack carrying on postural changes and gait pattern in rural children during treadmill walking. J Mod Rehabilit. 2016;9(S1):161-70. [Persian] [Link]
3. Nylund T, Mattila VM, Slami T, Pihlajamäki HK, Mäkelä JP. Recovery of brachial plexus lesions resulting from heavy backpack use: A follow-up case series. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:62. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-12-62]
4. Heidarimoghadam R, Motamedzade M, Roshanaei Gh, Ahmadi R. Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometric dimentions in male elementary schools . J Ergon. 2014;2(1):9-18. [Persian] [Link]
5. Mirzaei R, Ansari H, Khomri AA, Afrouz M. Survey of relationship between ergonomic and environmental conditions of classrooms and pain sensation in students. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2010;13(4):36-41. [Persian] [Link]
6. Desouzart G, Gagulic S. Analysis of postural changes in 2nd cycle students of elementary school. J Spine. 2017;6(1):1000357. [Link] [DOI:10.4172/2165-7939.1000357]
7. Zakeri Y, Baraz Sh, Gheybizadeh M, Bijan Nejad D, Mahmood Latifi S. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in primary school students in Abadan-Iran in 2014. Int J Pediatr. 2016;4(1):1215-23. [Link]
8. Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ. Guidelines For Work In Sitting Postures. In: Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ. Occupational Biomechanics. Hoboken: Wiley. [Link]
9. Najafi M, Kohan N, Najafi M, Mohammadzadeh Esmaily H, Shirazi M. Assessment of validity and reliability of attitudes to health professionals questionnaire (AHPQ) in Iran. Res Med EEdu. 2015;7(2):21-8. [Link] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.7.2.21]
10. Jabbari M, Alijanzadeh M, Vaziri M, Rahimi S. Validation measuring tool for evaluating the HSE culture in a manufacturing company. 2014;11(4):99-108. [Persian] [Link]
11. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika.1951;16(3):297-334. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF02310555]
12. Dixon JK. Exploratory factor analysis. Statistical methods for health care research. 2005;50(5):321. [Link]
13. Webb NM, Shavelson RJ, Haertel EH. 4 Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. Handb Stat. 2006;26:81-124. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0169-7161(06)26004-8]
14. Guttman L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika. 1945;10(4):255-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF02288892]
15. Trochim WMK. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluat Program Plan. 1989;12(1):1-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5]
16. Bartko JJ. On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychol bulletin. 1976;83(5):762. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.762]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author