Volume 4, Issue 4 (2019)
IJMPP 2019, 4(4): 243-248 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Maghbouli R, Kazemi S S. Intervention Educational Program and Health- Related Quality of Life among Employee: A Semi Experimental Design Study. IJMPP 2019; 4 (4) :243-248
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-40460-en.html
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-40460-en.html
1- School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, zanjan, Iran.
2- Diseases Unit, Chaloos Health Network, Chaloos, Iran. , somayeh.kazemi7@gmail.com
2- Diseases Unit, Chaloos Health Network, Chaloos, Iran. , somayeh.kazemi7@gmail.com
Abstract: (2613 Views)
Aims: Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) is an important outcome of health in different aspects of physical, mental and social dimensions. This study aimed to assess the effects of an educational program on Health- Related Quality of Life among employees HRQOL of employees working in Shariati hospital affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).
Method and Instrument: This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-post design study. Participants included employees of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The sample size was 31 employees who were randomly selected from all working employees in the hospital.
Selected employees were provided with two 60-minute session workshop as educational program. Data collected using demographic questionnaire and Short form of Quality of Life questionnaire (SF-36) at the begriming of the study and at 3- month follow up. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical tests (paired T-Test).
Findings: Totally 31 employees with mean age of 40 ± 9.04 were participated in the study. Comparing HRQOL dimensions of the studied participants before and after intervention indicated the improvement of dimensions as Role physical (P=0.01), Bodily pain (P= 0.04), General health (P= 0.04), Vitality (P= 0.008), Role emotional (P= 0.03), and Mental health (P= 0.003). However, there were no significantly increase in physical function and social function (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Finding of this study showed the educational program could be effective for improving the employees’ HRQOL
Method and Instrument: This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-post design study. Participants included employees of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The sample size was 31 employees who were randomly selected from all working employees in the hospital.
Selected employees were provided with two 60-minute session workshop as educational program. Data collected using demographic questionnaire and Short form of Quality of Life questionnaire (SF-36) at the begriming of the study and at 3- month follow up. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical tests (paired T-Test).
Findings: Totally 31 employees with mean age of 40 ± 9.04 were participated in the study. Comparing HRQOL dimensions of the studied participants before and after intervention indicated the improvement of dimensions as Role physical (P=0.01), Bodily pain (P= 0.04), General health (P= 0.04), Vitality (P= 0.008), Role emotional (P= 0.03), and Mental health (P= 0.003). However, there were no significantly increase in physical function and social function (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Finding of this study showed the educational program could be effective for improving the employees’ HRQOL
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Occupational Therapy
Received: 2020/02/5 | Accepted: 2020/02/9 | Published: 2020/02/20
Received: 2020/02/5 | Accepted: 2020/02/9 | Published: 2020/02/20
References
1. Bonomi P, Kim K, Fairclough D, Cella D, Kugler J, Rowinsky E, et al. Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: Results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial.J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(3):623. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.623]
2. Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):350-7. [DOI:10.3109/07853890109002089]
3. Nicassio PM, Kay MA, Custodio MK, Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Weisman MH. An evaluation of a biopsychosocial framework for health-related quality of life and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. J Psychosom Res. 2011;71(2):79-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.01.008]
4. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83. [DOI:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002]
5. Karbasian S, Talebian Sharif J, MS. A. The Effect of Group Training Assertiveness on Quality of Work Life of Khatam-ol-Anbia Hospital Staff (Mashhad). JSUMS. 2018;27(4):617-1.
6. Harkonmäki K, Lahelma E, Martikainen P, Rahkonen O, Silventoinen K. Mental health functioning (SF-36) and intentions to retire early among ageing municipal employees: the Helsinki Health Study. Scand J Public Health. 2006; 34(2):190-8. [DOI:10.1080/14034940510032419]
7. Ojala B, Nygård C-H, Huhtala H, Nikkari ST. Effects of a nine-month occupational intervention on health-related quality of life. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45(4):452-8. [DOI:10.1177/1403494817695912]
8. Heber E, Lehr D, Ebert DD, Berking M, Riper H. Web-based and mobile stress management intervention for employees: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e21; 1-15. [DOI:10.2196/jmir.5112]
9. Vingård E, Lindberg P, Josephson M, Voss M, Heijbel B, Alfredsson L, et al. Long-term sicklisting among women in the public sector and its associations with age, social situation, lifestyle, and work factors: a three-year follow-up study. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(5):370-5. [DOI:10.1080/14034940510005860]
10. Ray TK, Kenigsberg TYA, Pana-Cryan R. Employment arrangement, job stress, and health-related quality of life. Safety Science. 2017;100:46-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.003]
11. Solovieva TI, Dowler DL, Walls RT. Employer benefits from making workplace accommodations. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(1):39-45. [DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.03.001]
12. Edries N, Jelsma J, Maart S. The impact of an employee wellness programme in clothing/ textile manufacturing companies: a randomised controlled trial. BMC public health. 2013;13(1):1- 9. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-25]
13. Rongen A, Robroek SJ, van Lenthe FJ, Burdorf A. Workplace health promotion: a meta-analysis of effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):406-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.007]
14. Lindsay DB, Devine S, Sealey RM, Leicht AS. Time kinetics of physical activity, sitting, and quality of life measures within a regional workplace: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC public health. 2016;16(1):786. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3487-x]
15. Waldron EA, Janke EA, Bechtel CF, Ramirez M, Cohen A. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to improve cancer caregiver quality of life. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(6):1200-7. [DOI:10.1002/pon.3118]
16. Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Snyder C, Geigle P, Gotay C, editors. Are exercise programs effective for improving health-related quality of life among cancer survivors? A systematic review and metaanalysis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014; 1: 41(6): E326-42. [DOI:10.1188/14.ONF.E326-E342]
17. Fortney L, Luchterhand C, Zakletskaia L, Zgierska A, Rakel D. Abbreviated mindfulness intervention for job satisfaction, quality of life, and compassion in primary care clinicians: a pilot study. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(5):412-20. [DOI:10.1370/afm.1511]
18. Sutliffe JT, Carnot MJ, Fuhrman JH, Sutliffe CA, Scheid JC. A worksite nutrition intervention is effective at improving employee well-being: a pilot study. J Nutr Metab. 2018;2018:1-5. [DOI:10.1155/2018/8187203]
19. Ware J, Sherbourne C. Conceptual framework and item selection: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;3:473. [DOI:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002]
20. Ware Jr JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000;25(24):3130-9. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008]
21. Montazeri A, Goshtasbi A, Vahdaninia M. The short form health survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Payesh. 2006;5(1):49-56.
22. Soemantri A, Misdah M. The Influence of Internal Environment, Strategic Management of Human Resources and Quality of Work Life To Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance Outsourcing Company in East Java Province. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;7(3):244-54.
23. Hassan N, Maamor H, Razak A, Lapok F. The effect of quality of work life (QWL) programs on quality of life (QOL) among employees at multinational companies in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;112:24-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1136]
24. Pekkonen M. Health-related quality of life evaluation of the effectiveness of the institutional rehabilitation. The suitability of the RAND 36-meter to determine the working-age inpatient rehabilitation problem profile and evaluate the effects of rehabilitation. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino2010.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |