Volume 5, Issue 2 (2020)
IJMPP 2020, 5(2): 329-335 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kazemi S, Maghbouli R, Rafighi M. Effectiveness of the Back School Program in Employees Suffering from Low Back Pain. IJMPP 2020; 5 (2) :329-335
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-44807-en.html
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-44807-en.html
1- Health Network, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Chaloos, Iran.
2- Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran. , Rezamaghbouli74@gmail.com
3- Department of Education and Human Resources Development, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
2- Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran. , Rezamaghbouli74@gmail.com
3- Department of Education and Human Resources Development, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Abstract: (1474 Views)
Aims: To determine the effects of the in-person interventions in employees suffering from Low Back Pain (LBP).
Method and Instruments: A quasi-experimental methodological design was utilized for this study. Participants were employees with LBP who participated in the Back School program workshop. The demographic questionaire, Visual Analog Scales (VAS), and behavior questionnaires were filled at baseline and 2 -onths follow up. The data were entered into SPSS and analyzed through the paired T-Test.
Findings: Thirty-one participants (27 males, 4 females) completed this survey. The study participants’ mean age was 40 ± 9.04 years. The intervention led to a decrease in the LBP scores of the employees (P< 0.0001) and improving behavior related to LBP.
Conclusion: This program can be suitable for the reduction of pain and improving behavior related to low back health among employees in the workplace.
Method and Instruments: A quasi-experimental methodological design was utilized for this study. Participants were employees with LBP who participated in the Back School program workshop. The demographic questionaire, Visual Analog Scales (VAS), and behavior questionnaires were filled at baseline and 2 -onths follow up. The data were entered into SPSS and analyzed through the paired T-Test.
Findings: Thirty-one participants (27 males, 4 females) completed this survey. The study participants’ mean age was 40 ± 9.04 years. The intervention led to a decrease in the LBP scores of the employees (P< 0.0001) and improving behavior related to LBP.
Conclusion: This program can be suitable for the reduction of pain and improving behavior related to low back health among employees in the workplace.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
Received: 2020/07/29 | Accepted: 2020/08/11 | Published: 2020/08/31
Received: 2020/07/29 | Accepted: 2020/08/11 | Published: 2020/08/31
References
1. Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown A, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990- 2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545-602. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6]
2. Hay SI, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1260-344. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32130-X]
3. Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. The Lancet. 2017;389(10070):736-47. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9]
4. Stock S, Nicolakakis N, Raïq H, Messing K, and Lippel K, Turcot A. Underreporting work absences for nontraumatic work-related musculoskeletal disorders to workers ' compensation: results of a 2007-2008 survey of the Quebec working population. AJPH. 2014;104(3):e94-e101. [DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301562]
5. Stock SR, Nicolakakis N, Vezina M, Vezina N, Gilbert L, Turcot A, et al. Are work organization interventions effective in preventing or reducing work-related musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review of the literature. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018. 1;44(2):113-133.
6. Safety W, Board I. By the numbers: 2012 WSIB statistical report, Schedule 1. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), Toronto. 2013.
7. Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors; a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for workrelated musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. 1997.
8. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):769-81. [DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002]
9. Haldeman S, Kopansky-Giles D, Hurwitz EL, Hoy D, Erwin WM, Dagenais S, et al. Advancements in the management of spine disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012;26(2):263-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2012.03.006]
10. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008;8(1):8-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005]
11. Yang H, Haldeman S, Lu M-L, Baker D. Low back pain prevalence and related workplace psychosocial risk factors: a study using data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016;39(7):459- 72. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.07.004]
12. Vassilaki M, EL. H. Insights in public health: perspectives on pain in the low back and neck: global burden, epidemiology, and management. Hawaii Med J. 2014;73(4):122-6.
13. Waters TR, Dick RB, Krieg EF. Trends in work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a comparison of risk factors for symptoms using quality of work life data from the 2002 and 2006 general social survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(9):1013-24. [DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181fc8493]
14. Sterud T, Tynes T. Work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors for low back pain: a 3-year follow-up study of the general working population in Norway. J Occup Environ Med
15. Kazemi S-S, Tavafian S-S, Hidarnia A, Montazeri A. Consequences and factors affecting work-related low back pain among nursing professionals: A qualitative study. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2019;18(3):291-303.
16. Bartz PT, Vieira A, Noll M, Candotti CT. Effectiveness of the back school program for the performance of activities of daily living in users of a basic health unit in Porto Alegre, Brazil. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(9):2581-6. [DOI:10.1589/jpts.28.2581]
17. Straube S, Harden M, Schröder H, Arendacka B, Fan X, Moore RA, et al. Back schools for the treatment of chronic low back pain: possibility of benefit but no convincing evidence after 47 years of research-systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2016;157(10):2160. [DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000640]
18. Parreira P, Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Koes BW, Poquet N, et al. Back Schools for chronic non‐specific low back pain. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev. 2017(8). [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011674.pub2]
19. Brown KC, Sirles AT, Hilyer JC, Thomas MJ. Cost-effectiveness of a back school intervention for municipal employees. Spine. 1992;17(10):1224-8. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-199210000-00016]
20. McCormack HM, David JdL, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18(4):1007-19. [DOI:10.1017/S0033291700009934]
21. Van Hoof W, O'Sullivan K, O'Keeffe M, Verschueren S, O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W. The efficacy of interventions for low back pain in nurses: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;77:222-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.015]
22. Jaromi M, Nemeth A, Kranicz J, Laczko T, Betlehem J. Treatment and ergonomics training of work‐related lower back pain and body posture problems for nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(11‐12):1776-84. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04089.x]
23. Sowah D, Boyko R, Antle D, Miller L, Zakhary M, Straube S. Occupational interventions for the prevention of back pain: Overview of systematic reviews. J Safety Res. 2018;66:39-59. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.05.007]
24. Shebib R, Bailey JF, Smittenaar P, Perez DA, Mecklenburg G, Hunter S. Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):1-8. [DOI:10.1038/s41746-018-0076-7]
25. Sorensen G, McLellan DL, Sabbath EL, Dennerlein JT, Nagler EM, Hurtado DA, et al. Integrating worksite health protection and health promotion: A conceptual model for intervention and research. Am J Prev Med. 2016;91:188-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.005]
26. Anger WK, Elliot DL, Bodner T, Olson R, Rohlman DS, Truxillo DM, et al. Effectiveness of total worker health interventions. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20(2):226. [DOI:10.1037/a0038340]
27. Richmond H, Hall AM, Copsey B, Hansen Z, Williamson E, Hoxey-Thomas N, et al. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioural treatment for non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0134192. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0134192]
28. Maghbouli R, Kazemi S-S, Jamshidi AR. The effect of an educational Intervention on low back pain preventive behavior among nursing students: A pre-posted designed study. IJMPP. 2018;3(4):102-6.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |