Volume 7, Issue 3 (2022)
IJMPP 2022, 7(3): 759-764 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Raiisi F, Riyassi M. Understanding Cancer Patients' Lived Experience of Pain through Metaphors: A Qualitative Study. IJMPP 2022; 7 (3) :759-764
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-13377-en.html
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-13377-en.html
1- Cognitive science of language de- partment, Cognitive Science. Institute of Cognitive Science Studies. Shaid Chamran Bulv, Cognitive science Buvl; Edalat Sq, Phase 4 of Pardis City, Tehran, Iran.
2- Cognitive science of language de- partment, Cognitive Science. Institute of Cognitive Science Studies. Shaid Chamran Bulv, Cognitive science Buvl; Edalat Sq, Phase 4 of Pardis City, Teh- ran, Iran.
2- Cognitive science of language de- partment, Cognitive Science. Institute of Cognitive Science Studies. Shaid Chamran Bulv, Cognitive science Buvl; Edalat Sq, Phase 4 of Pardis City, Teh- ran, Iran.
Abstract: (2032 Views)
Aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate the lived experience of pain metaphors in cancer patients.
Method and Materials: The method of this study was qualitative with hermeneutic phenomenological approach. The study population included all cancer patients in Tehran in 2021-2022 who experienced pain from cancer and its treatment. According to the theoretical saturation rule, 20 cancer patients in stages 2 and 3 of the cancer were selected by purposive method and interviewed in-depth and semi-structured manner. The interview lasted from 40 to 90 minutes. The time and place of the interviews were determined by the participants. Questions with a general question as to what you analogized your experience with cancer and its treatments. After each interview and recording it, the content of the interview was written in fully. The extracted data were analyzed using the method of hermeneutic analysis of Diekelmann et al. (1989).
Findings: According to interpretive hermeneutic analysis; lived experiences of pain in cancer patients are 4 main themes including; the metaphor of lived war, the metaphor of lived scheduled pain cage, the metaphor of living in dark future with pain and the metaphor of lived with overload pain.
Conclusion: To conclude, metaphors have important role in pain expressions. Researchers suggest cognitive therapies to change metaphors of pain.
Method and Materials: The method of this study was qualitative with hermeneutic phenomenological approach. The study population included all cancer patients in Tehran in 2021-2022 who experienced pain from cancer and its treatment. According to the theoretical saturation rule, 20 cancer patients in stages 2 and 3 of the cancer were selected by purposive method and interviewed in-depth and semi-structured manner. The interview lasted from 40 to 90 minutes. The time and place of the interviews were determined by the participants. Questions with a general question as to what you analogized your experience with cancer and its treatments. After each interview and recording it, the content of the interview was written in fully. The extracted data were analyzed using the method of hermeneutic analysis of Diekelmann et al. (1989).
Findings: According to interpretive hermeneutic analysis; lived experiences of pain in cancer patients are 4 main themes including; the metaphor of lived war, the metaphor of lived scheduled pain cage, the metaphor of living in dark future with pain and the metaphor of lived with overload pain.
Conclusion: To conclude, metaphors have important role in pain expressions. Researchers suggest cognitive therapies to change metaphors of pain.
Subject:
Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention
Received: 2017/09/5 | Accepted: 2022/07/28 | Published: 2022/06/30
Received: 2017/09/5 | Accepted: 2022/07/28 | Published: 2022/06/30
References
1. Raiisi F, Amini F, Khani MM. Investigating the relationship between Skeletal-muscular Pains and Quality of Life among Nursing and Midwifery Students. IJMPP. 2020;5(2): 336-343. [DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.5.2.336]
2. Tehranizadeh M., Raiisi F. The Relationships between Depression, Pain Self-Efficacy, Physical Disability and Chronic Pain. IJMPP. 2020;5(3): 373-379. [DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.5.3.373]
3. Amini F, Raiisi F. The Relationship between Musculoskeletal Pain and Demographic Variables in Nursing and Midwifery Students. IJMPP. 2019; 4 (4) :256-262. [DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.4.4.256]
4. Kurklinsky S, Perez RB, Lacayo ER, Sletten CD. The Efficacy of Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Improving Function in People with Chronic Pain. Pain Res Treat. 2016: 7217684. [DOI:10.1155/2016/7217684]
5. SeminoE. Metaphor, creativity, andtheexperience of pain across genres. In Swann J, Carter R, Pope R, editors, Creativity, Language, Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2011. 83-102. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-349-92482-0_6]
6. Kövecses Z. Conceptual metaphor theory. The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 2017.
7. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 2008.
8. Raiisi F. Afrashi A. Nematzadeh SH. Moghadasin M. Conceptual Metaphors of time in Persian: A cognitive and Corpus-based Approach. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects. 2020; 8 (28): 15-29. [Persian].
9. Raiisi F. Conceptual Metaphors of Pain in Persian: A Cognitive Analysis. IJMPP. 2021; 6(2): 496-501. [DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.6.2.496]
10. Gibbs, R. Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press. 2017. [DOI:10.1017/9781107762350]
11. Kövecses K. Metaphor universals in literature. ANTARES: Letras e Humanidades. 2018; 10(20): 154-168. [DOI:10.18226/19844921.v10.n20.10]
12. Hashemian, M., Salemi, R., Jafarpour, A. A CognitiveStudy of Conceptual Metaphors in English and Persian: Universal or Culture-Specific?. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 2020; 8(1): 9-31.
13. Bullo S, Hearn JH. Parallel worlds and personified pain: A mixed-methods analysis of pain metaphor use by women with endometriosis. Br J Health Psychol. 2021, 26(2):271-288. [DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12472]
14. Deng Y, Yang J, Wan W. Embodied metaphor in communication about lived experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China. PLoS ONE, 2021 16(12): e0261968. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0261968]
15. Woodgate RL, Tennent P, Legras N. Understanding Youth's Lived Experience of Anxiety through Metaphors: A Qualitative, Arts-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 19;18(8):4315. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18084315]
16. Skelton JR, Wearn AM, Hobbs FD. A concordancebased study of metaphoric expressions used by general practitioners and patients in consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52(475):114- 118.
17. Scarborough BM, Smith CB. Optimal pain management for patients with cancer in the modern era. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(3):182- 196. [DOI:10.3322/caac.21453]
18. Chwistek M. Recent advances in understanding and managing cancer pain. F1000Res. 2017; 6:945. [DOI:10.12688/f1000research.10817.1]
19. Erol O, Unsar S, Yacan L, Pelin M, Kurt S, Erdogan B. Pain experiences of patients with advanced cancer: A qualitative descriptive study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018, 33:28-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2018.01.005]
20. Schreiber JA. Understanding the cancer pain experience. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(8):440. [DOI:10.1007/s11916-014-0440-5]
21. Abdollahimohammad A, Firouzkouhi M, Naderifar M. Lived Experiences of Iranian Cancer Patients After Survival: A Phenomenological Research. J Patient Exp. 2019, 6(2):164-168. [DOI:10.1177/2374373518800783]
22. Johnston-Devin C, Oprescu F, Gray M, Wallis M. Patients Describe their Lived Experiences of Battling to Live with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. J Pain. 2021, 22(9):1111-1128. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.151]
23. Diekelmann N, Allen D, Tanner CA. (1989). hermeneutic analysis of the NLN criteria for the appraisal of baccalaureate programs. The NLN criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: a critical hermeneutic analysis. New York: National League for Nursing; 11-34. 1989.
24. Field M, Laing CM, Nancy J, Moules NJ, McCaffrey G. Conducting Hermeneutic Research: From Philosophy to Practice (Critical Qualitative Research). Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers. 2015.
25. Dibley L, Dickerson S, Duffy M, Vandermause R. Doing Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research: A Practical Guide 1st Ed. SAGE Publications Ltd. 2020. [DOI:10.4135/9781529799583]
26. Khaleghpanah K. The Burden of Pain and Practicing Patience with the Body: The Phenomenology of Lived Experience of Chronic Pains in MS Patients. QJSS, 2020; 27(88): 145- 174.
27. Ostojic K, Sharp NL, Paget SP, Morrow AM. Lived experiences of pain in children and young people with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(3):364-371. [DOI:10.1111/dmcn.15061]
28. Afshari A, Homayounpour M, Serajpour N, Taheri Kashani Z. Exploring Lived Experience of Children with Cancer about the Disease and Its Consequences: A Qualitative Study. RPH, 2019; 13(1): 125-138. [Persian].
29. Raiisi F, Moghadasin M. Designing, Making and Evaluating Psychometric Characteristics of the Time Perception Pattern as Metaphorical Questionnaire Based on Cognitive- Dataset Analysis in Persians. Journal of Cognitive Psycholog. 2020; 8(2): 70-87. [Persian].
30. Álvarez I, Selva L, Medina JL, Sáez S. Using root metaphors to analyze communication between nurses and patients: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ, 2017; 17, 216. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-017-1059-0]
31. Raiisi F, Afrashi A, Moghadasin M, HajiKaram A, Nematzadeh S. Understanding of metaphorical time pattern among medical and paramedical students. based on gender, age and academic status. SJKU. 2019; 24 (4): 56-67. [DOI:10.29252/sjku.24.4.56]
32. Semino L. Descriptions of Pain, Metaphor, and Embodied Simulation. Metaphor Symb.2010; 25(4): 205-224. [DOI:10.1080/10926488.2010.510926]
33. Mathieson F, Jordan J, Stubbe M. Recent applications of metaphor research in cognitive behaviour therapy. Metaphor and the Social World, 2020, 10 (2):199 - 213. [DOI:10.1075/msw.00003.mat]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |