Volume 3, Issue 2 (2018)
IJMPP 2018, 3(2): 63-67 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Gholami T, Maleki Z, Ramezani M, Khazraee T. Application of Ergonomic Approach in Assessing Musculoskeletal Disorders Risk Factors among Administrative Employees of Medical University. IJMPP 2018; 3 (2) :63-67
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-22459-en.html
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-22459-en.html
1- “Non-Communicable Disease Research Center” and “Public Health Department, Health Faculty”, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran , gholamitahereh@yahoo.com
2- Public Health Department, Health Faculty, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
3- Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
2- Public Health Department, Health Faculty, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
3- Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
Abstract: (6382 Views)
Aims: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) is a usual complaint among workers engaged in static work, tasks requiring repetitive motion, and prolonged computer work. The aims of the present study were to assess office work-associated ergonomic risk factors using ROSA method as well as to identify which office equipment is more conducive to musculoskeletal disorders in office workers.
Instruments and Methods: This cross sectional descriptive study was conducted among 163 employees of Fasa University of Medical Sciences (FUMS), Iran, in 2017. Data were collected by simple random sampling method. Demographic characteristics questionnaire, Standardized Nordic questionnaire (NMQ), and rapid office strain assessment (ROSA) checklist were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. All the statistical analyses was carried out using SPSS 20 software.
Findings: The majority of musculoskeletal disorders in the last 12 months had occurred in lower back (60.7%), neck (50.9%), and knee (48.5%). Risk level for 137 participants (84.04%) was at the notification area (Score 3 to 5) and for 26 participants (15.95%) was at the need for ergonomic intervention area (score>5). Chair was identified as the major cause of pain in many parts of the body including elbows, lower back, knees, and legs.
Conclusion: Various risk factors, such as office equipment, in the workplace, may contribute to MSDs in different body regions. Chair is the major cause of pain in many parts of the body.
Instruments and Methods: This cross sectional descriptive study was conducted among 163 employees of Fasa University of Medical Sciences (FUMS), Iran, in 2017. Data were collected by simple random sampling method. Demographic characteristics questionnaire, Standardized Nordic questionnaire (NMQ), and rapid office strain assessment (ROSA) checklist were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. All the statistical analyses was carried out using SPSS 20 software.
Findings: The majority of musculoskeletal disorders in the last 12 months had occurred in lower back (60.7%), neck (50.9%), and knee (48.5%). Risk level for 137 participants (84.04%) was at the notification area (Score 3 to 5) and for 26 participants (15.95%) was at the need for ergonomic intervention area (score>5). Chair was identified as the major cause of pain in many parts of the body including elbows, lower back, knees, and legs.
Conclusion: Various risk factors, such as office equipment, in the workplace, may contribute to MSDs in different body regions. Chair is the major cause of pain in many parts of the body.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention
Received: 2018/01/15 | Accepted: 2018/02/26 | Published: 2018/06/21
Received: 2018/01/15 | Accepted: 2018/02/26 | Published: 2018/06/21
References
1. Lin Z, Popovic A, Human Resources Development Canada, Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada, Strategic Policy. Working with computers in Canada: An empirical analysis of incidence, frequency and purpose. Canada: Human Resources Development Canada; 2003.
2. Marshall K. Working with computers. Perspectives on Labour and Income. 2001;13(2):9.
3. Wahlström J. Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders and computer work. Occup Med (Lond). 2005;55(3):168-76. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqi083]
4. Derjani Bayeh A, Smith MJ. Effect of physical ergonomics on VDT workers' health: A longitudinal intervention field study in a service organization. Int J Human Comput Interact. 1999;11(2):109-35. [DOI:10.1207/S153275901102_3]
5. Gerr F, Monteilh CP, Marcus M. Keyboard use and musculoskeletal outcomes among computer users. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(3):265-77. [DOI:10.1007/s10926-006-9037-0]
6. Hagberg M, Wegman DH. Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulder-neck diseases in different occupational groups. Br J Ind Med. 1987;44(9):602-10. [DOI:10.1136/oem.44.9.602]
7. Korhonen T, Ketola R, Toivonen R, Luukkonen R, Häkkänen M, Viikari-Juntura E. Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(7):475-82. [DOI:10.1136/oem.60.7.475]
8. Jensen C, Finsen L, Søgaard K, Christensen H. Musculoskeletal symptoms and duration of computer and mouse use. Int J Ind Ergon. 2002;30(4-5):265-75. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00130-0]
9. Heinrich J, Blatter BM, Bongers PM. A comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load and duration of computer use. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(12):1027-31. [DOI:10.1136/oem.2004.013219]
10. Keir PJ, Bach JM, Rempel D. Effects of computer mouse design and task on carpal tunnel pressure. Ergonomics. 1999;42(10):1350-60. [DOI:10.1080/001401399184992]
11. Cook C, Burgess-Limerick R. The effect of forearm support on musculoskeletal discomfort during call centre work. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(4):337-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.005]
12. Matos M, Arezes PM. Ergonomic evaluation of office workplaces with Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA). Procedia Manuf. 2015;3:4689-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.562]
13. Mardi Gh, Kouhnavard B, Ahmadipanah V, Aghanasab M. An investigation of rapid office strain assessment and rapid upper limb assessment in visual display terminal users. J Health Res Commun. 2015;1(3):25-32. [Persian]
14. Sonne M, Andrews DM. The Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA): Validity of online worker self-assessments and the relationship to worker discomfort. Occup Ergon. 2011;10(3):83-101. [DOI:10.3233/OER-2012-0194]
15. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18(3):233-7. [DOI:10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-X]
16. Sonne M, Villalta DL, Andrews DM. Development and evaluation of an office ergonomic risk checklist: ROSA--Rapid office strain assessment. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(1):98-108. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.008]
17. Choobineh AR, Rahimi Fard H, Jahangiri M, Mahmood Khani S. Musculoskeletal injuries and their associated risk factors. Iran Occup Health J. 2012;8(4):70-81. [Persian]
18. Oha K, Animägi L, Pääsuke M, Coggon D, Merisalu E. Individual and work-related risk factors for musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional study among Estonian computer users. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:181. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-15-181]
19. Harcombe H, McBride D, Derrett S, Gray A. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders in New Zealand nurses, postal workers and office workers. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009;33(5):437-41. [DOI:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00425.x]
20. Madan I, Reading I, Palmer KT, Coggon D. Cultural differences in musculoskeletal symptoms and disability. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(5):1181-9. [DOI:10.1093/ije/dyn085]
21. Ariens G, Bongers P, Douwes M, Miedema M, Hoogendoorn W, van der Wal G, et al. Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58(3):200-7. [DOI:10.1136/oem.58.3.200]
22. Juul-Kristensen B, Jensen C. Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: The "BIT" follow up study on office workers. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(3):188-94. [DOI:10.1136/oem.2004.013920]
23. Gouvali MK, Boudolos K. Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(6):765-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009]
24. Panagiotopoulou G, Christoulas K, Papanckolaou A, Mandroukas K. Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(2):121-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.002]
25. Aarås A, Horgen G, Bjørset HH, Ro O, Walsøe H. Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomic interventions, A 6 years prospective study--Part II. Appl Ergon. 2001;32(6):559-71. [DOI:10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00030-8]
26. Tittiranonda P, Rempel D, Armstrong T, Burastero S. Effect of four computer keyboards in computer users with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med. 1999;35(6):647-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199906)35:6<647::AID-AJIM12>3.0.CO;2-5.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199906)35:6<647::AID-AJIM12>3.0.CO;2-5 [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199906)35:63.0.CO;2-5.]
27. van Niekerk SM, Louw QA, Hillier S. The effectiveness of a chair intervention in the workplace to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms, A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:145. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-13-145]
28. van Deursen DL, Lengsfeld M, Snijders CJ, Evers JJ, Goossens R. Mechanical effects of continuous passive motion on the lumbar spine in seating. J Biomech. 2000;33(6):695-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00231-6]
29. Gerr F, Marcus M, Monteilh C. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders among computer users: Lesson learned from the role of posture and keyboard use. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):25-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.014]
30. Szeto GPY, Chan CCY, Chan SKM, Lai HY, Lau EPY. The effects of using a single display screen versus dual screens on neck-shoulder muscle activity during computer tasks. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014;44(3):460-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.003]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |