Volume 6, Issue 4 (2021)
IJMPP 2021, 6(4): 588-594 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moazemi Goodarzi A, Tavafian S S, Delshad M H. Low Back Pain Preventive Intervention in Clinical Workers in Lorestan Hospitals in Iran. IJMPP 2021; 6 (4) :588-594
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-36400-en.html
URL: http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-36400-en.html
1- Health Education and Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Health Education and Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ,tavafian@modares.ac.ir
3- Department of Public Health Department, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran Health Sciences Research Center, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran ((H.Delshad@modares.ac.ir).
2- Health Education and Health Promotion Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. ,
3- Department of Public Health Department, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran Health Sciences Research Center, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran ((H.Delshad@modares.ac.ir).
Abstract: (1569 Views)
Aims: Low Back Pain (LBP) is a serious and prevalent health problem, especially worldwide. This study evaluated the impact of an interventional program on promoting the knowledge, attitude and practice among a clinical worker to prevent low back pain in Lorestan hospitals,
Iran.
Method and Materials: in this interventional study, 80 clinical workers who were working in the two hospitals of Lorestan province in Iran, were divided randomly into an intervention (N=40) and control (N=40) group. The intervention group took part in the itervenional program while the control group received no intervention. The demographic questionnaire and a researcher - made questionnaire were used.
Findings: In all 40 clinical workers in each group of intervention with mean age of 33.18±6.025 years and control group with mean age of 31.40± 6.732 years took part in the study. The mean scores of knowledge, in the control group versus intervention group, immediately after
intervention, 3-, and 6 - months follow-up were 13.00±1.79 vs 13.28 ±2.21, 13.03±2.15 vs 14.93±1.28, and 13.03±2.15 vs 14.38±1.67 respectively which were significant in two time points of 3- and 6- month follow ups (P<0.05) . Regarding, the mean scores of attitude the scores of control versus intervention group were 39.386.45± vs 40.136.86±, 39.55±6.11vs 43.98±4.81, and 39.43±5.64 vs 43.60±5.74, respectively; and for behavior the scores in control vs intervention group were 16.96±6.90 vs 15.05±4.52; 16.05± 4.5 vs 18.35±5.30, and 16.00±4.60 vs 18.13±4.80, respectively.
Conclusions: This study showed that the interventional program is an effective intervention to promote preventive behavior of LBP in clinical workers.
Iran.
Method and Materials: in this interventional study, 80 clinical workers who were working in the two hospitals of Lorestan province in Iran, were divided randomly into an intervention (N=40) and control (N=40) group. The intervention group took part in the itervenional program while the control group received no intervention. The demographic questionnaire and a researcher - made questionnaire were used.
Findings: In all 40 clinical workers in each group of intervention with mean age of 33.18±6.025 years and control group with mean age of 31.40± 6.732 years took part in the study. The mean scores of knowledge, in the control group versus intervention group, immediately after
intervention, 3-, and 6 - months follow-up were 13.00±1.79 vs 13.28 ±2.21, 13.03±2.15 vs 14.93±1.28, and 13.03±2.15 vs 14.38±1.67 respectively which were significant in two time points of 3- and 6- month follow ups (P<0.05) . Regarding, the mean scores of attitude the scores of control versus intervention group were 39.386.45± vs 40.136.86±, 39.55±6.11vs 43.98±4.81, and 39.43±5.64 vs 43.60±5.74, respectively; and for behavior the scores in control vs intervention group were 16.96±6.90 vs 15.05±4.52; 16.05± 4.5 vs 18.35±5.30, and 16.00±4.60 vs 18.13±4.80, respectively.
Conclusions: This study showed that the interventional program is an effective intervention to promote preventive behavior of LBP in clinical workers.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Occupational Therapy
Received: 2019/09/13 | Accepted: 2021/09/11 | Published: 2021/10/9
Received: 2019/09/13 | Accepted: 2021/09/11 | Published: 2021/10/9
References
1. Oranye NO, Bennett J. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal injuries in health care workers: the implications for work disability management Ergonomics2018;61:355-366. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2017.1361552]
2. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention .The Lancet 2018;391:2356-2367. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X]
3. Geidl W, Schlesinger S, Mino E et al. Dose- response relationship between physical activity and mortality in adults with noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies . Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020;17:1-18. [DOI:10.1186/s12966-020-01007-5]
4. Christensen JR, Faber A, Ekner D et al. Diet, physical exercise and cognitive behavioral training as a combined workplace based intervention to reduce body weight and increase physical capacity in health care workers-a randomized controlled trial .BMC public health 2011;11. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-671]
5. Samaei SE, Mostafaee M, Jafarpoor H et al. Effects of patient-handling and individual factors on the prevalence of low back pain among nursing personnel .Work. 2017;56:551-561. [DOI:10.3233/WOR-172526]
6. Dabbous MK, Moustafa SM, Sakr FR et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Lebanese community pharmacists with regard to selfmanagement of low back pain Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2020;19:873-878. [DOI:10.4314/tjpr.v19i4.28]
7. Hu Y, Wang X, Tucker JD et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice with respect to antibiotic use among Chinese medical students: a multicentre crosssectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:1165. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph15061165]
8. Breivik H, Borchgrevink P, Allen S et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:17-24. [DOI:10.1093/bja/aen103]
9. Solaimanizadeh L, Jafari M, Pourhaji F et al. Chronic low back pain and disability among nurses: a cross sectional study from Bam, Iran. International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention. 2016;1:29-33.
10. Salah M, Mahdy NE, Mohamed L. Effect of educational program on performance of Intensive Care Nurses to Decrement the low back Pain Life Sci J. 2012;9:3109-3125.
11. Kazemi SS, Tavafian S-S, Montazeri A. The social media intervention for lower back pain education study (SMILE): a protocol for a randomized trial to reduce occupational low back pain in nursing professionals International. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention. 2019, 4(3): 211-221 . [DOI:10.21203/rs.2.12199/v1]
12. Tavafian SS, Jamshidi AR, Mortazeri A. A Randomized Study of Back School in zerWomen With Chronic Low Back Pain: Quality of Life at Three, Six, and Twelve Months Follow-up. Spine. 2008; 33(15):1617-21 [DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd31c]
13. Khalednejad M, Tavafian S, Niknami S. The Effect of Exercise Program on Low Back Pain Preventive Behaviors in Pregnant Females Referred to Health Centers of Karaj. J Educ Community Health 2016;3:32-40. [DOI:10.21859/jech-03025]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |