Using the Social Cognitive Theory to Investigate the Factors Influencing Working Women’s Ability to Maintain Proper Posture at Work

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Z. S. Hosseini 1
S. S. Tavafian 1
O. Ahmadi 2
R. Maghbouli 3
1 Department of Health Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Medical sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Hasheminejad hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/ijmpp.8.3.915
Abstract
Aims: This study is centered on the identification of key factors that contribute to the maintenance of proper posture, aiming to mitigate the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) arising from repetitive motions and inadequate body positioning in work settings.

Methods: This ross-sectional research was performed to examine the factors influencing the maintenance of proper body posture while working in the assembly line by 250 female workers. The study employed a two-phase cluster sampling technique for participant selection and gathered information about demographic traits, variables associated with Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), and behavior through self-report surveys. The amassed data were subjected to analysis using SPSS version 21 software. This analysis encompassed statistical techniques including Pearson’s correlation and regression tests which all conducted at a significance threshold of p<0.05.

Findings: Totally 250 female workers with mean age of 35.15±7.99 took part in the study. The mean years of their work experience was 8.00±5.91. The study’s results demonstrated a noteworthy correlation between maintaining proper body posture during work and SCT

constructs (p<0.05), except for outcome expectations. Moreover, barrier structures, normative beliefs, intention, and knowledge were recognized as the most crucial determinants of behavior.

Conclusions: The study reveals a noteworthy connection between proper posture and (SCT) components, validating its predictive capacity for endorsing ergonomic practices. This enriches our comprehension of how SCT factors impact the adoption of correct task posture, aiding in targeted interventions and underlining the need for varied strategies to tackle the complex behavioral influences in workplaces.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Mosavianasl Z, Nemati Ajvadi A, Babayi Pouya A. Evaluation of Workplaces and Corrective Actions in the Central Iranian Steel Industries. Arch Hyg Sci. 2018;7(3):208–15.
2. Hoe VCW, Urquhart DM, Kelsall HL, Sim MR. Ergonomic design and training for preventing work‐related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8).
3. Haleem MH, Ali I, Khan S, Jehangir A, Ullah I. Work related musculoskeletal disorders in physical therapists; a systematic review. Rehman J Heal Sci. 2020;2(2):28–35.
4. Samaei SE, Tirgar A, Khanjani N, Mostafaee M, Bagheri Hosseinabadi M. Effect of personal risk factors on the prevalence rate of musculoskeletal disorders among workers of an Iranian rubber factory. Work. 2017;57(4):547–53.
5. Ranjan A, Zhao Y. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders and its Impact on Lost Production Days among Industrial Workers: A Data Analytics Approach. In: 2020 International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS). IEEE; 2020. p. 35–40.
6. Omojunikanbi OA, Akinpelu AO, Ekechukwu END. Prevalence, pattern and predictors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among oil workers in Nigeria. Work. 2022;71(1):151–63.
7. Guerreiro M, Serranheira F, Cruz EB, Sousa-Uva A. An analysis on neck and upper limb musculoskeletal symptoms in Portuguese automotive assembly line workers. Int J Occup Environ Saf. 2017;1(1):59–68.
8. Shin W, Park M. Ergonomic interventions for prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in a small manufacturing assembly line. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;25(1):110–22.
9. Golbaghi A, Nematpour L, Dehaghi BF. The Comparison of Risk Factors Caused by Musculoskeletal Disorders in Female Assembly Workers utilizing MFA and NERPA Methods. Arch Occup Heal. 2020;
10. Ghorbani E, Keivanpour S, Sekkay F, Imbeau D. Ergonomic Assembly Line Balancing Problems Evolution and Future Trends with Insights into Industry 5.0 Paradigm. 2023;
11. Khandan M, Vosoughi S, Azrah K, Poursadeghiyan M, Khammar A. Decision making models and human factors: TOPSIS and Ergonomic Behaviors (TOPSIS-EB). Manag Sci Lett. 2017;7(2):111–8.
12. Weiss B, Jahn A, Hyatt CS, Owens MM, Carter NT, Sweet LH, et al. Investigating the neural substrates of antagonistic externalizing and social-cognitive theory of mind: An fMRI examination of functional activity and synchrony. Personal Neurosci. 2021;4:e1.
13. Ong SC, Thakumar AV. Factors Associated With Dietary Behaviors Among Malaysian Adults: Application of the Social Cognitive Theory. J Educ Community Heal. 2022;9(2):86–93.
14. Oztug O, Cowie H. Coping with Musculoskeletal Pain: Implications for Office Workers. Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2011;10(1):81–8.
15. Denadai MS, Alouche SR, Valentim DP, Padula RS. An ergonomics educational training program to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders to novice and experienced workers in the poultry processing industry: a quasi-experimental study. Appl Ergon. 2021;90:103234.
16. Vakili MM, Babakhani L, Mehrabi Z, Kamali K, Namadian M, Shakibazadeh E. Development and psychometric analysis of a tool to measure parents and teachers about preventive behaviors in adolescence about HIV/AIDS based on health belief model: an Iranian population and cultural based study. Koomesh. 2019;21(2).
17. Ipsen C, Edwards K, Poulsen S, Seim R. Applying boundary objects to create coherence between management decisions regarding prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders and implemented changes. In: 2017 European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology: Enabling Change through Work and Organizational Psychology. 2017.
18. Greene BL, DeJoy DM, Olejnik S. Effects of an active ergonomics training program on risk exposure, worker beliefs, and symptoms in computer users. Work. 2005;24(1):41–52.
19. Brown NI, Pekmezi DW, Oster RA, Courneya KS, McAuley E, Ehlers DK, et al. Relationships between Obesity, Exercise Preferences, and Related Social Cognitive Theory Variables among Breast Cancer Survivors. Nutrients. 2023;15(5):1286.
20. Canino S, Raimo S, Boccia M, Di Vita A, Palermo L. On the embodiment of social cognition skills: The inner and outer body processing differently contributes to the affective and cognitive theory of mind. Brain Sci. 2022;12(11):1423.
21. Eng N, Sun Y, Myrick JG. Who is your fitspiration? An exploration of strong and weak ties with emotions, body satisfaction, and the theory of planned behavior. Health Commun. 2023;38(7):1477–89.
22. Bagherniya M, Sharma M, Mostafavi F, Keshavarz SA. Application of social cognitive theory in predicting childhood obesity prevention behaviors in overweight and obese Iranian adolescents. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2015;35(2):133–47.
23. Jekauc D, Völkle M, Wagner MO, Mess F, Reiner M, Renner B. Prediction of attendance at fitness center: a comparison between the theory of planned behavior, the social cognitive theory, and the physical activity maintenance theory. Front Psychol. 2015;6:121.
24. Camacho NB, Rocha NPR, Orozco MFB, Martínez MBA, Ojeda GM. E-health Intervention Based on the Social Cognitive Theory to Improve Vegetables and Fruit Consumption in Working Adults: Study Protocol. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021;5(Supplement_2):961.
25. Szczepanska WK, Scholz U, Liszewska N, Luszczynska A. Social and cognitive predictors of fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents: The context of changes in body weight. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(5):667–79.
26. Akbari-Chehrehbargh Z, Tavafian SS, Montazeri A. The structural relationship between spine-related behavior among pupils and the constructs of social cognitive theory: a structural equation modeling analysis. Payesh (Health Monit. 2020;19(5):581–9.
International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention
Volume 8, Issue 3
October 2023
Pages 915-920