The Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy in the Relationship between Curiosity and Academic Well- being among Adolescents with Physical and Motor Disabilities

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ah- vaz, Iran
2 Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
Aim: Adolescence is a very sensitive and important period in everybody’s life, particularly in individuals with disabilities, because it can significantly impact their experiences. The present study aimed to investigate the mediating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between curiosity and academic well-being among adolescents with physical and motor disabilities.

Method and Materials: The statistical population in this descriptive correlational study included all the adolescents 12-18 years old with physical and motor disabilities in Khuzestan Province of Iran during the academic year 2022–2023. The study sample consisted of 282 adolescents who selected using purposive sampling. The research instruments included the Academic Wellbeing Questionnaire, the two-dimensional Curiosity and Discovery Inventory, and the Students’ Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SASEQ). The proposed model was evaluated using structural equation modeling (SEM).

Findings: The results revealed that there was a significant direct path from curiosity to academic self-efficacy (P<0.001). However, the direct relationship between curiosity and academic well-being was not significant. In addition, a significant relationship, mediated by academic self-efficacy was found between curiosity and academic well-being linked by an indirect path (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Overall, the modified final model exhibited a good fit. Accordingly, this model can be considered a useful step in identifying factors that influence academic well-being of adolescents with physical and motor disabilities.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Turkel S, Pao M. Late consequences of chronic pediatric illness. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2007; 30(4):819-835. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2007.07.009
2. Salim N, vishal J. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Pain among Secondary School Students. International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention. 2021; 6(3):519-528. doi: 10.52547/ijmpp.6.3.519.
3. Beqaj S, Tërshnjaku EET, Qorolli M, Zivkovic V. Contribution of Physical and Motor Characteristics to Functional Performance in Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome: A Preliminary Study. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2018; 24:159-167. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.910448.
4. van Timmeren EA, van der Schans CP, van der Putten AA, et al. Physical health issues in adults with severe or profound intellectual and motor disabilities: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017; 61(1):30-49. doi: 10.1111/jir.12296.
5. Li S, Yu W, Li W, Wang J, Gao L, Li S. The Impact of Whole-Body Vibration Training on Bone Minerals and Lean Mass in Children and Adolescents with Motor Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(2):266. doi: 10.3390/children9020266.
6. Mpofu J, Sefotho MM, Maree JG. Psychological well-being of adolescents with physical disabilities in Zimbabwean inclusive community settings: An exploratory study. Afr J Disabil. 2017; 6:325. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.325.
7. Liu H, Wang M, Wan H, Lyu Y, Zhu H. An Empirical Study on Students’ Academic Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in Live Webcast Classes. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2):501. doi: 10.3390/su13020501.
8. Rajati F, Ashtarian H, Salari N, Ghanbari M, Naghibifar Z, Hosseini SY. Quality of life predictors in physically disabled people. J Educ Health Promot. 2018; 7:61. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_115_17.
9. Arslan G. School Bullying and Youth Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors: Do School Belonging and School Achievement Matter? Int J Ment Health Addic. 2022;20(4):2460-77. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00526-x.
10. Marsigliante S, Gómez-López M, Muscella A. Effects on Children's Physical and Mental Well-Being of a Physical-Activity-Based School Intervention Program: A Randomized Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031927.
11. Minotti BJ, Ingram KM, Forber-Pratt AJ, Espelage DL. Disability community and mental health among college students with physical disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2021; 66(2):192-201. doi: 10.1037/rep0000377.
12. Hsieh N, Waite L. Disability, Psychological Well-Being, and Social Interaction in Later Life in China. Res Aging. 2019; 41(4):362-389. doi: 10.1177/0164027518824049.
13. Wijnia L. Well-being, academic success, and the role of relationships. Edu Psychol. 2021; 41(8):949-51. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2021.1994305.
14. Mavilidi MF, Drew R, Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Schmidt M, Riley N. Effects of different types of classroom physical activity breaks on children's on-task behaviour, academic achievement and cognition. Acta Paediatr. 2020; 109(1):158-165. doi: 10.1111/apa.14892.
15. Jongbloed-Pereboom M, Peeters A, Overvelde A, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, Steenbergen B. Learning of writing letter-like sequences in children with physical and multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2015; 36C:150-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.005.
16. Bordbar M, Samadieh H. The Mediating Role of Epistemic 2022in the Relationship between University Students’ Epistemic Beliefs and Agentic Engagement. Studies in Learning and Instruction. 2020; 12(1): 82-102. doi: 10.22099/JSLI.2020.5783.
17. Tarigan FE, Siagian IV, Jamil B, Rozik A. The Effect of Teaching Strategies and Students Curiosity on Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension. Cybernetics: Journal Educational Research and Social Studies. 2021; 2(4):66-80.‏ doi: 10.51178/cjerss.v2i4.311.
18. Lemberger-Truelove M, Ceballos P, Molina C, Carbonneau K. Growth in Middle School Students’ Curiosity, Executive Functioning, and Academic Achievement: Results from a Theory-Informed SEL and MBI School Counseling Intervention. Prof Sch Counsel. 2021; 24:2156759X10076. doi: 10.1177/2156759X211007654.
19. Subbotsky E. Curiosity and exploratory behaviour towards possible and impossible events in children and adults. Br J Psychol. 2010; 101(Pt 3):481-501. doi: 10.1348/000712609X470590.
20. Lei W, Wang X, Dai DY, Guo X, Xiang S, Hu W. Academic self-efficacy and academic performance among high school students: A moderated mediation model of academic buoyancy and social support. Psychol Sch. 2022; 59(5):885-99. doi: 10.1002/pits.22653.
21. Cai J, Lian R. Social Support and a Sense of Purpose: The Role of Personal Growth Initiative and Academic Self-Efficacy. Front Psychol. 2022; 12:788841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788841.
22. Doménech-Betoret F, Abellán-Roselló L, Gómez-Artiga A. Self-Efficacy, Satisfaction, and Academic Achievement: The Mediator Role of Students' Expectancy-Value Beliefs. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01193.
23. Sahraei S, Shokri O, Khanbani M, Hakimi Rad E. Relationship between academic self-efficacy beliefs with academic well- being: the role of academic stress and achievement emotions. Edu Psychol. 2018; 14(49):53-84. doi: 10.22054/jep.2019.10366.1388.
24. Mortazavi SS, Hosseini SA, Haghgoo HA, Shirmohammadi N. Musculoskeletal Disorders in Adolescent Students with Low Vision and Hearing Impairment. International Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain Prevention. 2021; 6(3):529-537. doi: 10.52547/ijmpp.6.3.529.
25. Loehlin JC, Beaujean AA. Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Taylor & Francis.‏ 2016.
26. Bagheri Hosseinabadi F, Abedi MR. Construction and validation of academic well-being questionnaire. Research in Humanities Islamic. 2021; 25(1):10-39. doi: 10.22034/JOHI.2021.0502.0938.
27. Kashdan TB, Rose P, Fincham FD. Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2004; 82(3):291-305. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05
28. Kaveh Farsani Z, Zafarizadeh A, Bahrami F, Marzban A, Jelodari A, Ghasemi Z. Psychometric Properties of Curiosity and Exploration Inventory: Exploratory and Confirmative Factor Analysis. Educational Innovations. 2016; 15(2):151-164. https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_79093.html?lang=en
29. Mazaheri Z, Sadeghi A. Development and Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Students' Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. New Educational Approaches. 2016; 10(2):61-80. https://nea.ui.ac.ir/article_20905.html?lang=en
30. Trautner M, Schwinger M. Integrating the concepts self-efficacy and motivation regulation: How do self-efficacy beliefs for motivation regulation influence self-regulatory success? Learn Individ Differ. 2020; 80:101890. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101890.