Evaluation of Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Electromyographic Activity in Healthy Adult Males During Common Strength Exercises: A Systematic Review

Document Type : Systematic Review

Authors
University of Tehran
Abstract
Aims: The primary objective of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on quadriceps femoris muscle activity, as measured by sEMG, in healthy adult males during common strength exercises.

Method and Materials: This systematic review used the PRISMA guidelines. Original research articles published up to December 2023 were retrieved from the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria required studies to (a) be available in full-text English, (b) utilize cross-sectional or longitudinal study designs (experimental or cohort), (c) report electromyography activity as a percentage of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC), (d) analyze Rectus Femoris (RF), Vastus Lateralis (VL), and Vastus Medialis (VM) muscles, (e) focus on resistance training exercises as the primary intervention, (f) be published within the last ten years, and (g) include healthy adult male participants.

Findings: The review results indicated that the VL was the most frequently studied quadriceps muscle across different exercises. Notably, the leg press demonstrated the highest activation levels for both the VL and VM, while the Spanish squat elicited the highest activation for the RF. Additionally, the deadlift showed substantial activation of the VL, though to a lesser extent than the leg press.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of exercise selection for targeting specific quadriceps muscles during strength training. Furthermore, to ensure the accuracy and reliability of sEMG data, it is critical to establish standardized methodological criteria for its use.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Maestroni L, Read P, Bishop C, Papadopoulos K, Suchomel TJ, Comfort P, et al. The Benefits of Strength Training on Musculoskeletal System Health: Practical Applications for Interdisciplinary Care. J Sports Med. 2020;50(8):1431-50.
2. Bennie JA, Shakespear-Druery J, De Cocker K. Muscle-strengthening Exercise Epidemiology: a New Frontier in Chronic Disease Prevention. Sports Med - Open. 2020;6(1):40.
3. Fragala MS, Cadore EL, Dorgo S, Izquierdo M, Kraemer WJ, Peterson MD, et al. Resistance Training for Older Adults: Position Statement From the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(8).
4. Ramari C, Hvid LG, David ACd, Dalgas U. The importance of lower-extremity muscle strength for lower-limb functional capacity in multiple sclerosis: Systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;63(2):123-37.
5. Garhammer J. Weight lifting and training. In: Vaughan CL, editor. Biomechanics of sport. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020. p. 169-211.
6. Migliaccio GM, Dello Iacono A, Ardigò LP, Samozino P, Iuliano E, Grgantov Z, et al. Leg Press vs. Smith Machine: Quadriceps Activation and Overall Perceived Effort Profiles. Front physiol. 2018;9.
7. Martín-Fuentes I, Oliva-Lozano JM, Muyor JM. Evaluation of the Lower Limb Muscles’ Electromyographic Activity during the Leg Press Exercise and Its Variants: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020; 17(13).
8. Xiong D, Zhang D, Zhao X, Zhao Y. Deep Learning for EMG-based Human-Machine Interaction: A Review. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin. 2021;8(3):512-33.
9. Shayesteh M, Farahpour N, Jafarnezhadgero A. Comparisons of The Effects of Squat and Leg ‌Press Exercises on The EMG Activity of Quadriceps Femoris Muscles During Step Descending Activity. Int J Appl Exerc Physiol. 2019;15(29):143-54.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41.
11. Martín-Fuentes I, Oliva-Lozano JM, Muyor JM. Electromyographic activity in deadlift exercise and its variants. A systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(2):e0229507.
12. Macadam P, Feser EH. EXAMINATION OF GLUTEUS MAXIMUS ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC EXCITATION ASSOCIATED WITH DYNAMIC HIP EXTENSION DURING BODY WEIGHT EXERCISE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019;14(1):14-31.
13. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(5):361-74.
14. Antunes L, Bezerra EdS, Sakugawa RL, Dal Pupo J. Effect of cadence on volume and myoelectric activity during agonist-antagonist paired sets (supersets) in the lower body. Sports Biomech. 2018;17(4):502-.
15. Brentano MA, Umpierre D, Santos LP, Lopes AL, Radaelli R, Pinto RS, et al. Muscle Damage and Muscle Activity Induced by Strength Training Super-Sets in Physically Active Men. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(7).
16. Haun CT, Mumford PW, Roberson PA, Romero MA, Mobley CB, Kephart WC, et al. Molecular, neuromuscular, and recovery responses to light versus heavy resistance exercise in young men. Physiol Rep. 2017;5(18):e13457.
17. Stien N, Pedersen H, Ravnøy AH, Andersen V, Saeterbakken AH. Training specificity performing single-joint vs. multi-joint resistance exercises among physically active females: A randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0233540.
18. Barnes MJ, Miller A, Reeve D, Stewart RJC. Acute Neuromuscular and Endocrine Responses to Two Different Compound Exercises: Squat vs. Deadlift. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(9).
19. Collins KS, Klawitter LA, Waldera RW, Mahoney SJ, Christensen BK. Differences in Muscle Activity and Kinetics Between the Goblet Squat and Landmine Squat in Men and Women. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(10).
20. Coratella G, Tornatore G, Longo S, Borrelli M, Doria C, Esposito F, et al. The Effects of Verbal Instructions on Lower Limb Muscles’ Excitation in Back-Squat. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022;93(2):429-35.
21. Kephart WC, Mumford PW, McCloskey AE, Holland AM, Shake JJ, Mobley CB, et al. Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2016;13(1):30.
22. Lee J-H, Kim S, Heo J, Park D-H, Chang E. Differences in the muscle activities of the quadriceps femoris and hamstrings while performing various squat exercises. BMC sports sci, med rehabil. 2022;14(1):12.
23. Trindade TB, Neto LO, Pita JCN, Tavares VDdO, Dantas PMS, Schoenfeld BJ, et al. Pre-stretching of the Hamstrings Before Squatting Acutely Increases Biceps Femoris Thickness Without Impairing Exercise Performance. Front physiol. 2020;11.
24. Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Willardson JM, Fontana F, Tiryaki-Sonmez G. Muscle activation during low- versus high-load resistance training in well-trained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(12):2491-7.
25. Stien N, Saeterbakken AH, Andersen V. Electromyographic Comparison of Five Lower-Limb Muscles between Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises among Trained Men. J Sports Sci Med. 2021;20(1):56-61.
26. Alegre LM, Ferri-Morales A, Rodriguez-Casares R, Aguado X. Effects of isometric training on the knee extensor moment–angle relationship and vastus lateralis muscle architecture. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114:2437–46.
27. Llurda-Almuzara L, Labata-Lezaun N, López-de-Celis C, Aiguadé-Aiguadé R, Romaní-Sánchez S, Rodríguez-Sanz J, et al. Biceps Femoris Activation during Hamstring Strength Exercises: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021; 18(16).
28. Neto WK, Soares EG, Vieira TL, Aguiar R, Chola TA, Sampaio VL, et al. Gluteus Maximus Activation during Common Strength and Hypertrophy Exercises: A Systematic Review. J Sports Sci Med. 2020;19(1):195-203.